I think it would be a project that was not much in the general lights, but it had a great impact on the way the industry operated in our artistic specialization. Several years ago, we worked on developing new leading program technology to simulate aerodynamics, which gave us a great advantage in accuracy and flexibility.
People thought it could not be done, so when we were publicly published with it, we surprised the entire industry, because we showed that in reality it was possible, and we were the first team to achieve this in the world.
The dynamic innovation was in the heart of the philosophy of Audi Vorsprung Durch Technik for more than 50 years. What are the models during the Audi history that brought the largest steps forward in Aero’s design and efficiency?
There is no doubt that Audi 100 in 1982 and Audi A2 in 1999 were the two largest innovators in the burning engine world. Both were driven by the need to significantly improve fuel consumption and thus their design was mainly driven.
At that time, the greenhouse was very simplified, flowing glass, and the edge of the AUDI aerodynamic body is very revolutionary in car design. The A2 also pushed the limits of the car design at its rates based on the work of Wunibald Kamm and its improved wheels.
Now that we have entered EVS era, I am very liked what we achieved with E-Tron GT and A6 E-Tron. In a very general sense, I am proud that we were able to demonstrate with these two cars that there is no basic inconsistency between the first -class air dynamics and bright progressive design.
In the case of E-Tron GT, we were able to benefit from the components of the active compounds to achieve the results of the distinctive air dynamics, while the A6 E-Tron uses a large number of detailed engineering solutions to optimize.
In that memo, what are the inherent advantages that Kahrba brings to the worlds of design and dynamic efficiency? What about defects? How is this Audi overcoming?