Modern vehicles have more auxiliary systems on the plane than ever. In theory, it not only reduces stress, but also adds another level of safety. In the real world, this is the way these systems work largely. However, a recent study indicates that seizure control can cause more harm than its benefit.
The researchers from the Netherlands collected data from all over the world about the effectiveness of ADAS in reducing accident accidents. The study focused on 28 specific functions for cars, from simple useful features such as the actual time tire pressure monitoring to camera systems, navigation wings, blind alerts, and active safety technology such as the automatic emergency brakes. Systems were finally classified into four levels of reaction:
- Systems media – low levels of control and urgency
- Warning systems – low control and high urgency
- Overlanding systems – high control and high urgency
- Systems enhancement systems – high control and low argument
In realistic situations, the study concluded that everything in the first three categories has no effect, or reduces the possibility of accidents. The tire pressure screen (media system) does not occur, but the help of maintaining a lane showed a 19.1 percent decrease in accidents. The driver’s monitoring system has reduced collapse rates by 14 percent. These are warning and overlapping systems, and they are ranked higher in study.
Standard and adaptive seizure control was the only systems that have increased the possibility of failure. Cruise Standard is a 12 percent increase, while the adaptive journey increased the opportunity by 1.8 percent. A certain data point showed an 8 % increase in adaptive cruises, although other reports showed that they could Reduce The risks are a little.
As you can guess, the driver’s distraction is listed as a reason for both degrees, although it is especially true for standard control control. By reducing the driver of some duties behind the steering wheel, the selection can make them less aware of their surroundings.
Cruise can lead to adaptive, as the car can accelerate and speed up the brakes automatically to keep the next safe distance, to a wandering mind instead of vigilance driving. However, the study indicates that not all adaptive cruise systems are able to discover slow or fixed things properly. In theory, braking should be entered in the automatic emergency situations of these situations. But not all vehicles that have a adaptive cruise have a braking in emergency situations. The driver can calm down to a false feeling of confidence, and to rely on the system to stop when he is unable to do so.
the The full report is available here. Ultimately, regardless of the auxiliary systems on the plane, the driver is responsible for keeping things safe behind the steering wheel.